Access Denied was the premier maker of classic shastity betls. Unfortunately, after the death of its founder, the business also died. It was the hands-down favorite for quality, fit, and service. The owners of this business
were long time players in the New York d/s scene. They also own a stainless steel
fabricating company. The combination of dedication to the scene combined with a fully
equipped stainless steel fabricating facility was unbeatable. The Access denied belt is a work of art.
It is fashioned from gleaming stainless steel. All parts that come in contact with the skin (except
the rear chains) are either coated with a patented baked-on plastic coating, or protected
by a rubber extrusion (the waist band). This device is beautiful to behold! At about $500
it is the most expensive of the chastity belts we reviewed.
Like the other devices, the Access Denied belt requires precise fitting. Measurements must be taken by at least two people and repeated s few times to guarantee accuracy. Your humble reporter was fitted by the owners in their showroom. My fitting was interesting. I was asked to undress completely and then a tape measure was threaded between my legs, around my penis, and all sorts of other usually-unmeasured parts of me. When my flaccid penis length was measured, your reporter was told that his penis is exactly the average for American males. So much for your now-humble reporter's delusions of grandeur.
The finished belt was beautiful. A stainless steel waistband fits very tightly around the waist (a tad above your reporter's belly button). At first it felt like it was preventing breathing, but a few hours later, it was comfortable. The penis tube prevents stimulation of the penis, but interestingly also prevents the usual sensations cause by clothing moving over it. It was very noticeable. It wasn't easy to put on the first time, but by the third try it was simple and fast.
The locks are secure and the hasps are protected so that nothing short of major cutting tools can get it off without a key. The penis can not be removed from the tube when the belt is on. All bodily functions are simple, though one must sit when urinating when wearing it, and there is considerable dripping afterward. This requires additional TP (toilet paper) each time. Other functions are not affected at all. Showering was simple and effective. It is suggested a shower head that is on a hose be used to allow rinsing some of those now hard-to-reach areas. Sleep was no problem and there was no pain when your reporter experienced his usual morning arousal, even though the diameter of the tube was too small to permit him to become erect.
Until another, reliable belt-maker emerges, this reporter's best advice is to try to find an Access Denied belt that is a good fit on the used belt market.
Like any belt, the downside of this product is that it does not allow unrestricted movement of the body. You will find yourself lifting with your legs, and bending at the waist is difficult at best. Your reporter doesn't want to think about what airport security might say.
In summary, of all the belts available, the Access Denied product was the best made, best designed, and most secure.